ADS 468x60

Monday, January 24, 2011

Social Networking, the next hot investment hub


Social Networking, investing in the hot tech sector




Coming into the 2011s a sector will be the next hot bed for stocks, in the 20s it was financials and industry, the 50s it was brands like Ford and IBM that led the economy, in the 90s the tech companies, the early 2000s it was real estate. As we go into the second year of this decade social networking is the industry everyone wants a piece of. Only problem is you have to be either a client of Goldman Sachs (alla Facebook) or on the inside via private/angel investors. I am going to take a look at some very familar companies that are defining the this industry. Companies that potentially could have a future IPO in the making, how ever only one is the safest bet at this stage of the game.

First off I'll start with Facebook, for those of you stuck under a rock the past decade facebook is the queen mother of the social networking industry. Started in 2004 inside the Harvard dorm room of Mark Zuckerberg, the company initially was a way for college co-eds to network within a cleaner version of myspace (I myself was skeptical how ever became addicted very quickly). Initially facebook was exclusive to college co-eds but a year later a high school version was implemented. Today the company has grown to have an estimated 550 million users worldwide, usage of the website is mostly for up to date news about your friends and friends' friends and their friends.

What differs facebook from other websites are its vast data about its users, facebook uses this data to drive ads (which is where their revenue is derived from) to a centralized group. For example, if you are a fan of say, Manny Pacquiao, as you surf through the facebook website advertisements of Manny Pacquiao related items will show from companies that advertise through facebook thus paying facebook each time your click on a related link (the system is called pay per click). It's a very streamlined income stream that works for both the users and the advertisers, it's also available to anyone and everyone for the right price. So companies as big as Apple can advertise to a specific fan base as well as small boutiques like "rps" a local sneaker shop in the Capitol Hill area of Seattle can advertise their goods.

Now to the good stuff, I read in a recent Wall Street Journal article that Goldman Sachs was offering private placement stock in the social networking giant. This raised issues with SEC on whether or not facebook could exist as a private company. So naturally questions came abound if a facebook IPO would be in the near future so I did some digging and found that currently it's estimated Facebook is valued as a 50 Billion dollar company. The growth potential has been staggering, from an initial report of 52 million in revenue in 2006 to most recently 2 Billion in 2010, wow. Did I also mention this company has 0 debt? Wow talk about our value company, and the way the numbers go it's still growing. Financial companies own pretty big stakes in the company, Accel Partners and Digital Sky Tech own a 10% stake each as well as MSFT and Inter-republic Group oh and big Goldman Sachs. Pretty alluring company to invest in eh? Well I disagree, facebook has definately layed the ground work for the industry but let's keep looking.


Twitter, the brain child of Jack Dorsey's implementation of SMS technology came during a brain storming session involving mexican food at playground. Orginally the technology was used within Dorsey's, company of employment, Odeo. Eventually the company broke off and became its own company and it caught very quickly. Twitter initially started with 52 million in venture capitalist funds, initially it was thought the company would participate in e-commerce how ever a structure similar to google adwords was implemented in early of 2010. Basically it works like, "promoted tweets", big companies such as: Starbucks, Sony, Redbull, and Best Buy are participating.

Revenues for Twitter are not nearly as big as facebook but are respectable. It was reported (but cannot be verified) that close to $6 million in 2009 with projections of 1.54 billion in revenue with 144 million of net income in 2013 the company reports the possibility of an ipo in 2013.

Twitter is great for anyone trying to reach a vast audience and the growing number of users is consistent how ever twitter does not have a specific revenue stream and their un-official numbers are not consistent with what potential this company has. Until they can replicate a consistent and clear cut revenue stream I would be weary about investing in an ipo here. The venture capitalists made their money here and will run.




GroupOn, what an amazing website, in tough times like today people are trying to find value in everything they do for leisure so when you can get a massage for 50% off from this website it's an amazing value. GroupOn hit the social networking scene in 2009 and growth has been white hot for this company. So hot that early in 2010 Google offered 6 billion for the website and what did GroupOn do? Rejected it, I believe GroupOn is still in the pre-mature stages of growth and only realizing its potential for more revenues. How ever let's look at what GroupOn Does for business.

GroupOn derives its income predominately from cutting a part of the revenues from their retailer affiliates. For example, ABC coffee shop will offer a coupon of $30.00 certificate for the price of $15.00. Groupon will take a percentage of the revenues as long as the coupon quota is met for that day. Deals are given out for specific regions, predominately in metro urban areas where mobile devices dominate (you won't find GroupOn deals in the middle of Novascotia). GroupOn employees some very savy creative staff to describe in a marketable fashion the deals given out each day. Companies range from small coffee shops to big retailers like GAP, so the list of companies is potentially endless.

Unfortunately I couldn't find any projection of revenues for this company how ever with the huge valuations given for GroupOn they have to be growing at an accelerating rate. GroupOn faces a major hurdle, copy cats, copy cats are clearly identified in Living Social, BuyWithMe, Groop Swoup, even Google is coming out with their own version of the site.One thing GroupOn does have is a clear dominance in this category of social networking.

Although GroupOn is off to a white hot start I belive there is just too much competition for them to really separate themselves from the pack, as of right now they have a leg up on the competition but so did yahoo.



Linkedin, this is the crown jewel of the crop, El majico, the king of social networking (investments wise) if you're gonna get in an IPO linkedin is my recommendation to put your chips on all the way. First a little bit of background of the company, Linkedin founded in 2002 by an ex Yahoo executive is the facebook of professional social networking. The way the website works is users upload their professional profile. What industries they are a part of, different job titles/careers, etc, from here it's as easy as facebook to professionally network with colleagues and see how professionally close you are to say that Senior Vice President at the new investment firm you would sell your first born to be a part of. It's a very un in your face way to network as well as find potential new employers.

Now let's take a look at the revenue stream, so obviously we're talking banner advertisements and your usual ppc/ppr deals yada yada you all know that. How ever what seperates Linkedin from say facebook, twitter, Groupon, etc is revenue straight from the users. Much like say espn.com insider users pay a premium for more precise services. So if you're a recruiter and want more in depth information on that potential job candidate you have to pay a service fee which could cost near $5K. Wow, "the most valuable commodity I know of is information" (Gordon Gecko-WallStreet), also your regular user that desires access to advanced networking has to pay monthly fees ranging from $24.95-$99.95/month. That is a serious revenue stream for the company that members will pay. The closest thing to that is Facebook's virtual currency which has not even come out to the public yet.

Now the valuation at this point is some 1.2 Billion (I found this number on the actual Linkedin website) for 2010, plus estimated revenues of 228 million. This is all estimated and not actual numbers for the company how ever with a growing number of people that are getting used to networking and are in search of work we could see revenues grow very quickly. This company has a solid revenue stream and the good news there is an anticipated 2011 IPO.

Tech may struggle (so far it has been about 50/50) but I believe there needs to be a push from social media and if any of these companies does come public this year I would put a big recommendation to Linkedin.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Tech stocks may struggle in 2011

This week has been pretty brutal in regards to tech, the market leaders were slammed this week. AAPL, FFIV, GOOG, RVBD, INTC, and others may have a rough year going forward. AAPL had monster earnings this past quarter and despite that report the stock dropped 15 points off its 52 week high, of course this can be attributed to the news of Steve Jobs sudden medical leave announcement but we will have to see if investors come to their senses and buy the stock and sit on it until it hits 400 which it may by April. Now the reason I believe tech stocks will have meager earnings this year is simple, over valuation and the absence of social networking stocks.

We all know about the private placement of Facebook by Goldman Sach's which may ultimately force an ipo for the online behemoth but until then we won't have a) new breed of tech to lead us into the next decade from an investing stand point b) a sector that can ultimately spread positive earnings through out the tech industry much like how the above aforementioned have. Tech works in sync with each other much more than any other sector, the industry is so intrictly connected that if one company does sour it hurts the whole nasdaq.

Now touching on the over valuation, we have to leave established companies such as AAPL and GOOG out of this conversation but if we look at these stocks P/E ratios, just the slightest dip in expected earnings (which we saw with FFIV this past week) will crush the stock.
-FFIV p/e=58.68
-RVBD p/e=241
-AMZN p/e=73.70
-BIDU p/e=86.96

Those are just a few stocks which remind me of the over valued dotcom stocks of the late 2000s (read the intelligent investor it will blow your mind the valuation of these stocks). If these stocks report lack luster earnings they will refall I guarantee you which is exactly why I am straying away from these stocks. 2011 may prove that these stocks are over valued and a correction in tech may come a float. Touching on my earlier comment this could roll over into all of tech through out 2011, all I ask for is continued earnings at sustained growth.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

AAPL/VZ and other musings for 2011



Good Morning to my 2 or 3 followers, it's been a while since I have blogged about investments but shoot nobody is perfect, how was our 2010? Well, myself and a few friends did pretty well with $HWD, $AAPL, $ECPN, $CSTR, and $CIM adding to our future retirement and palatial palaces in Bora Bora (man I wish). So I start 2011 with some great news, you will see below, it's good stuff to look forward to, I wish you all luck and in your investing triumphs so let's go for 2011!! Keep on trading, no speculating :)




Finally, after all the speculation, complaints, waiting, and wondering VZ and AAPL will be introducing the brand new Iphone to VZ. This union is a long time coming and I cannot wait for the announcement on Tuesday, Jan 11, 2011, this is going to be huge. AAPL is expected to earn some 20 Billion in revenue at the end of the 4th quarter but this estimate was before the VZ iphone. I believe for 1st qtr 2011 we could see a 6 billion dollars in revenues for AAPL, because the much anticipated Ipad 2 as well as new adopters of the iphone verizon. Now if you're asking yourself whether to invest in VZ or AAPL obviously I'd take AAPL over VZ. VZ has a p/e of 230!!! That's a ridiculious valuation as opposed to AAPL's humble 22.19 p/e ratio, still not confident? Buy some AAPL 230 call options...they're currently trading near 24, we'll see what happens on Tuesday.

What's next for AAPL? Couldn't tell you but I am so confident in this stock that I'll accumulate at 320, that's if it drops that low...

As for the rest of 2011, I really do not see a bull market compared to last year. I definately see a DOW 12000 (granted I don't really use the DOW as a measure for stock performance) how ever I believe Dow 11,000 would be a safer haven for a fundamental stock market. There are just too many pressing issues that need to be resolved. We still have a high unemployment (near 9.0%) which according to Ben Bernanke will take a couple more years to get back to sustainable levels. Couple that with an uncertain real estate outlook and rising 10-year treasury rates we are still in for slow growth for 2011-12. Lower than expected retail levels from last month show the consumer agrees as well. If you are a long term investor look to tech, cloud computing is going to be key for the future and it's happening now. I like $CA as well as $AAPL and even $ORCL, these guys are going to be the leaders in cloud computing.




I like the guy with the classes pointing in the air, so serious...